A nice young woman from the law offices of Groodbud & Groodbud had a baby not too long ago. After three months of maternity leave, she - no doubt begrudgingly - separated herself from her newborn and returned to her job, a part of which is heading up an internal environmentalism group (use glass mugs not paper cups, that kind of thing). In the customary fashion of recent parents, she posted a few pictures of her daughter on the door to her office. (The Catman has long considered posting pictures of his "child," a 2-month old basil plant named, of all things, Basil). This morning, the Catman, Hater of all things Good and Fair, was accused of a crime, which he may or may not have committed.
Catman: yesterday someone taped green horns and a mustache to _____ baby pictures
Catman: ____ thinks it was me
Catman: im's me
Catman: asking if i know about it
Catman: f you
Catman: if it had been me i would have drawn big x's through them
What do you think? Is the Catman innocent or guilty? Sound off below.
Where there any paw prints near the spot of the crime?
ReplyDeletethe catman was probably the purrpetrator
ReplyDeleteInnocent until proven guilty. This has not been proven beyond a reasonable meowt.
ReplyDeleteThough the Catman does have a history of strongly disliking small children, this act seems to be the work of a much more creative mind.
ReplyDeleteBitch better use cloth diapers
ReplyDelete